CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Annette Kuhn

British film scholar (1945-)

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ17542650
Source-derived summary

Annette Frieda Kuhn, FBA is a British author, cultural historian, educator, researcher, editor and feminist. She is known for her work in screen studies, visual culture, film history and cultural memory. She is Emeritus Professor in Film Studies at Queen Mary University of London.

Career

Kuhn earned a bachelor's degree in 1969 and master's degree in 1975 in sociology at the University of Sheffield. While at Sheffield, she served as the Research Officer at the Sheffield Students' Union, during which period she worked on a campaign for a University crèche. Kuhn also co-convened the Sheffield University Women's Studies Group, organising public seminars and film screenings. As a research assistant at Sheffield she co-authored a survey of British university graduates which supported the notion that first children among several have higher educational achievement than their siblings. During the same period, she also co-authored, with Keith Kelsall, "Graduates: The Sociology of the Elite", which looked at women graduates and their careers, or lack thereof.

She co-edited Feminism and Materialism (1978) with AnnMarie Wolpe, was part of the founding editorial collective of Feminist Review (1979- ) and was a member of the women's photography group Second Sight.

In the mid-1970s, Kuhn began writing, teaching and publishing in film studies, often from a feminist standpoint.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Annette Kuhn” is british film scholar (1945-). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Annette, Kuhn and British, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1969, 1975, 1978, 1979—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1945-09-29. For this dossier, Annette, Kuhn and British is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “british film scholar (1945-)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Object files, edition statements, performance records and contemporary criticism preserve different stages of the work’s history. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q17542650. VIAF identifies the subject as 100213103. The Library of Congress control number is n81147533. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1969, 1975, 1978 and 1979.

Critical limits

Later fame can flatten the distinction between original context, subsequent adaptation and institutional collecting history. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Annette Kuhn”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Annette Kuhn primary sources, Annette Kuhn archive and Annette research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Annette Kuhn”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Annette Kuhn” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.