CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel

French salon-holder (1605-1694)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ2850831 ↗
Source-derived summary

Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel (1605–1694) was a French salonnière. After having been widowed in 1650, she established a famed literary salon in Paris. She was known for her witty remarks and was often quoted.

References

Reid, Joyce M.H.; Poggi, Luciano (2002). Diccionario de la literatura francesa. Gremese.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel” as french salon-holder (1605-1694). Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1605, 1694, 1650, 2002—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1605-11-29. The account is most persuasive where Anne-Marie, Bigot and Cornuel can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as french salon-holder (1605-1694). Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2850831. VIAF identifies the subject as 253411964. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1605, 1694, 1650 and 2002.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel primary sources, Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel archive and Anne-Marie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Anne-Marie Bigot de Cornuel” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.