CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Anna Meschini Pontani

Italian researcher (1949–2021)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ61481413 ↗
Source-derived summary

Anna Pontani (née Meschini; 11 February 1949 – 20 November 2021) was an Italian Byzantinist and scholar of the Renaissance, professor in Byzantine philology at the University of Padua.

Biography

Born in Affile in a working-class family — her father was a railway worker, her mother a workwoman at the Snia —, Meschini studied at the "Mancinelli" lyceum in Velletri and graduated from the Sapienza University of Rome (1968–1972) defending a thesis on Euripides' Rhesus. In 1972 she was nominated Research assistant at the University of Padua, invited by Filippo Maria Pontani, then-professor of Byzantine studies. In 1980 she became associate professor, and was promoted Professor in Byzantine studies in 1987. She taught in Padua until her retirement in 2019.

She and Filippo Maria Pontani married in 1975 and remained together until his premature death in 1983. Their only son, Filippomaria, is (2025) Professor in Classical philology at the Ca' Foscari University of Venice and fellow of the Accademia dei Lincei.

She died in 2021 in Padua.

Research activity

Meschini Pontani edited, translated and commented the Chronological narration by Niketas Choniates, in three volumes. She is best known, however, as a leading scholar in Renaissance studies, and a specialist of Greek scholars and studies in the Italian Renaissance.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Anna Meschini Pontani” is italian researcher (1949–2021). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Anna, Meschini and Pontani, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1949, 2021, 1968, 1972—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1949-02-11, 1949-01-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. For this dossier, Anna, Meschini and Pontani is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “italian researcher (1949–2021)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q61481413. VIAF identifies the subject as 71514014. The Library of Congress control number is nb99179696. 3 of 7 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1949, 2021, 1968 and 1972.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anna Meschini Pontani”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anna Meschini Pontani primary sources, Anna Meschini Pontani archive and Anna research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anna Meschini Pontani”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Anna Meschini Pontani” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.