CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Angelica Roos

Swedish weightlifter

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ26268943 ↗
Source-derived summary

Anna Angelica Ulrika Roos (born 15 April 1989) is a Swedish weightlifter, who competed in the 58 kg category and represented Sweden at international competitions. She participated in the women's 58 kg event at the 2016 Summer Olympics. She competed at European Weightlifting Championships most recently at the 2016 European Weightlifting Championships.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Angelica Roos” as swedish weightlifter. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Angelica, Roos and Swedish.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1989, 2016—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1989-04-15. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Angelica, Roos and Swedish providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Angelica Roos”, the useful work is to connect “swedish weightlifter” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q26268943. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1989 and 2016.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Angelica Roos”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Angelica Roos primary sources, Angelica Roos archive and Angelica research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Angelica Roos”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Angelica Roos” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.