Ankeny–Artin–Chowla congruence
Open-knowledge reference entry

In number theory, the Ankeny–Artin–Chowla congruence is a result published in 1953 by N. C. Ankeny, Emil Artin and S. Chowla. It concerns the class number h of a real quadratic field of discriminant d > 0. If the fundamental unit of the field is
ε
=
t
+
u
d
2
{\displaystyle \varepsilon ={\frac {t+u{\sqrt {d}}}{2}}}
with integers t and u, it expresses in another form
h
t
u
(
mod
p
)
{\displaystyle {\frac {ht}{u}}{\pmod {p}}\;}
for any prime number p > 2 that divides d. In case p > 3 it states that
−
2
m
h
t
u
≡
∑
0
<
k
<
d
χ
(
k
)
k
⌊
k
/
p
⌋
(
mod
p
)
{\displaystyle -2{mht \over u}\equiv \sum _{0<k<d}{\chi (k) \over k}\lfloor {k/p}\rfloor {\pmod {p}}}
where
m
=
d
p
{\displaystyle m={\frac {d}{p}}\;}
and
χ
{\displaystyle \chi \;}
is the Dirichlet character for the quadratic field. For p = 3 there is a factor (1 + m) multiplying the LHS. Here
⌊
x
⌋
{\displaystyle \lfloor x\rfloor }
represents the floor function of x.
A related result is that if d=p is congruent to one mod four, then
u
t
h
≡
B
(
p
−
1
)
/
2
(
mod
p
)
{\displaystyle {u \over t}h\equiv B_{(p-1)/2}{\pmod {p}}}
where Bn is the nth Bernoulli number.
There are some generalisations of these basic results, in the papers of the authors.
See also
Herbrand–Ribet theorem, similar for ideal class groups of cyclotomic fields.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Ankeny–Artin–Chowla congruence” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 15, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q2993026. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1953.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Ankeny–Artin–Chowla congruence”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Ankeny–Artin–Chowla congruence primary sources, Ankeny–Artin–Chowla congruence archive and Ankeny research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ankeny–Artin–Chowla congruence”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Ankeny–Artin–Chowla congruence” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.