CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Androlepsy

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 6, 2025
Entity authorityQ2503852
Source-derived summary

Androlepsy or Androlepsia (Ancient Greek: ἀνδροληψία) or Androlepsion (Ancient Greek: ἀνδρολήψιον), was an ancient Greek legal concept that served as a form of reprisal in cases of homicide. It was recognized by the international law of the Greeks; so that if a citizen of one state killed someone from another state and the perpetrator's country refused to surrender the murderer, the family of the deceased had the right to seize three citizens of the offender's state as hostages.

These hostages would remain captive until the murderer was either handed over for justice or satisfaction was otherwise provided. Additionally, the property found on the hostages was confiscated, a practice known as σῦλα or σῦλαι.

This right of reprisals was part of the broader international law in ancient Greece, with commanders and trierarchs often tasked with carrying out the act. It was connected to ancient religious customs surrounding the "avenger of blood," where it was believed that the guilt from a murder was attached to the land where the crime occurred until the killer was either punished or exiled. In cases where the murderer fled to another region, the right of reprisals could prevent the harboring of the murderer, thus enforcing justice.

The concept extended to familial obligations, where the right to seek justice was tied to the inheritance rights of the deceased's relatives, typically limited to second cousins. While there is uncertainty about how the hostages were treated or whether foreigners could be taken as hostages, the principle was rooted in ancient Greek ideas of justice and reparation.

Some scholars describe the Androlepsia as similar to the modern extradition treaties, while others believe that it was part of the ancient jus gentium (meaning the law of nations or international law) and was not based on a formal treaty or agreement between states.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Androlepsy” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Androlepsy, Open-knowledge and entry, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 301-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Androlepsy, Open-knowledge and entry is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 6, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2503852. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Androlepsy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Androlepsy primary sources, Androlepsy archive and Androlepsy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Androlepsy”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Androlepsy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.