Rebecca Andridge
biostatistician
Rebecca Roberts Andridge is an American statistician. Her statistical research concerns the imputation of missing data and the statistics of group-randomized trials; she has also performed highly-cited applied statistical work on omega-3 nutritional supplements and on the health benefits of using yoga to lower stress. Andridge is a professor of biostatistics at the Ohio State University.
Education and career
Andridge majored in economics at Stanford University, graduating in 1999. She went to the University of Michigan for graduate study, earning a master's degree in 2005 and completing her Ph.D. in biostatistics in 2009. Her dissertation, Statistical Methods for Missing Data in Complex Sample Surveys, was supervised by Roderick J. A. Little.
In 2009, after completing her Ph.D., she joined the Ohio State University College of Public Health as an assistant professor of biostatistics. She was tenured as an associate professor in 2016. At Ohio State, she also holds affiliations with the Institute for Population Research, Food Innovation Center, and Decision Sciences Collaborative.
Recognition
Andridge was elected as a Fellow of the American Statistical Association in 2020.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Rebecca Andridge” as biostatistician. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as biostatistician. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q47816926. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999, 2005, 2009 and 2016.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Rebecca Andridge”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Rebecca Andridge primary sources, Rebecca Andridge archive and Rebecca research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rebecca Andridge”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Rebecca Andridge” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.