CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Andrei Rapeika

Belarusian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 28, 2024
Entity authorityQ4755926 ↗
Source-derived summary

Andrei Albinovich Rapeika (Belarusian: Андрэй Альбинович Рапейка; Russian: Андрей Альбинович Рапейко; born 21 September 1971) is a former Belarusian professional footballer.

Club career

He made his professional debut in the Belarusian Premier League in 1992 for Shakhtyor Soligorsk . He played 6 games in the 1997 UEFA Intertoto Cup for FC Lokomotiv Nizhny Novgorod.

Editorial summary

“Andrei Rapeika” enters the record as belarusian footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Andrei, Rapeika and Belarusian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1971, 1992, 1997—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1971-09-21. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Andrei, Rapeika and Belarusian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Andrei Rapeika” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Andrei, Rapeika and Belarusian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 28, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q4755926. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1971, 1992 and 1997.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Andrei Rapeika”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Andrei Rapeika primary sources, Andrei Rapeika archive and Andrei research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Andrei Rapeika”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Andrei Rapeika” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.