Anastasia Tambovtseva
Russian bobsledder and luger
Anastasiya Valeryevna Tambovtseva (née Skulkina; Russian: Анастасия Валерьевна Тамбовцева (Скулкина); born August 11, 1982) is a Russian luger and bobsledder who competed from 2001 to 2006. Competing in two Winter Olympics, she earned her best finish of 21st in the women's singles event at Turin in 2006.
Tambovtseva's best finish at the FIL European Luge Championships was 16th at Altenberg in 2002.
Since 2007, Tambovtseva has competed in bobsleigh. Her best World Cup finish was 13th at Park City, Utah in November 2009.
At the 2010 Winter Olympics in Vancouver, Skulikina finished ninth in the two-woman event.
References
2002 luge women's singles results
2006 luge women's singles results
Anastasia Tambovtseva at the International Bobsleigh and Skeleton Federation
"FIL-Luge profile: Anastasia Skulkina". Archived from the original on November 3, 2013. Retrieved November 8, 2007.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
Evans, Hilary; Gjerde, Arild; Heijmans, Jeroen; Mallon, Bill; et al. "Anastasia Tambovtseva".
The public source identifies “Anastasia Tambovtseva” as russian bobsledder and luger. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Anastasia, Tambovtseva and Russian.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Anastasia Tambovtseva”, the useful work is to connect “russian bobsledder and luger” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 7, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4450893. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1982, 2001, 2006 and 2002.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Anastasia Tambovtseva”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Anastasia Tambovtseva primary sources, Anastasia Tambovtseva archive and Anastasia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anastasia Tambovtseva”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Anastasia Tambovtseva” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.