CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Analisa

newspaper in Indonesia

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ4751033
Source-derived summary

Analisa (non-standard Indonesian for Analysis) is a broadsheet newspaper published daily in Medan, the capital of the North Sumatra province in Indonesia. Published since 23 March 1972, Analisa is one of the largest newspaper in Medan. It was initially published once a week before becoming a daily newspaper.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Analisa” is newspaper in Indonesia. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Analisa, newspaper and Indonesia, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1972—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1972-01-01. For this dossier, Analisa, newspaper and Indonesia is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “newspaper in Indonesia” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4751033. Authority coordinates are 3.589, 98.678. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1972.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Analisa”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Analisa primary sources, Analisa archive and Analisa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Analisa”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Analisa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.