CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Amphistomiasis

parasitic disease of livestock animals and humans

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ16002898
Source-derived summary

Amphistomiasis is a parasitic disease of livestock animals, more commonly of cattle and sheep, and humans caused by immature helminthic flatworms belonging to the order Echinostomida. The term amphistomiasis is used for broader connotation implying the disease inflicted by members of Echinostomida including the family Paramphistomidae/Gastrodiscidae (to be precise, the species Gastrodiscoides hominis); whereas paramphistomiasis is restricted to that of the members of the family Paramphistomidae only. G. discoides and Watsonius watsoni are responsible for the disease in humans, while most paramphistomes are responsible in livestock animals, and some wild mammals. In livestock industry the disease causes heavy economic backlashes due to poor production of milk, meat and wool.

Signs and symptoms

Symptoms include:

Physical weakness, emaciation or lethargy

Foul smell of faeces, greasy consistency and scour or diarrhoea

Anorexia, refusal to eat food

Dehydration and frequent drinking of water

Submaxillary oedema (bottle jaw) and pale mucous membrane

Intestinal bleeding (haemorrhagic enteritis) with anaemia and low blood protein (hypoproteinaemia)

Damage to the bile duct, and liver cirrhosis

In humans (specifically gastrodiscoidiasis) symptoms include diarrhoea, fever, abdominal pain, colic, and an increased mucus production. Large amounts of eggs can cause tissue reactions in the heart or mesenteric lymphatics, which may lead to death. Mortality among native Assamese children is attributed to this infection.

Cause

Amphistomiasis in farm and wild mammals is due to infection of paramphistomes, such as the species of Paramphistomum, Calicophoron, Cotylophoron, Pseudophisthodiscus, etc. These are essentially rumen flukes, of which Paramphistomum cervi is the most notorious in terms of prevalence and pathogenicity. Infection occurs through ingestion of contaminated vegetables and raw meat, in which the viable infective metacercaria are deposited from snails, which are the intermediate hosts.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Amphistomiasis” as parasitic disease of livestock animals and humans. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Amphistomiasis, parasitic and disease.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 279-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Amphistomiasis, parasitic and disease providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Amphistomiasis”, the useful work is to connect “parasitic disease of livestock animals and humans” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16002898. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Amphistomiasis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Amphistomiasis primary sources, Amphistomiasis archive and Amphistomiasis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Amphistomiasis”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Amphistomiasis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.