5-Aminotetrazole
chemical compound

5-Aminotetrazole is an organic compound with the formula HN4CNH2. It is a white solid that can be obtained both in anhydrous and hydrated forms.
The molecule is planar. The hydrogen bonding pattern in the hydrate supports the assignment of NH being adjacent to carbon in the ring.
Preparation
A synthesis of 5-aminotetrazole through the action of nitrous acid on aminoguanidine was reported by Johannes Thiele in 1892.
The exact structure of the compound was not known at the time, although it was known to crystallize as a monohydrate. The correct structural formula was published in 1901 by Arthur Hantzsch, who obtained it from the reaction between cyanamide and hydrazoic acid.
To avoid direct handling of the problematic hydrazoic acid, a mixture of sodium azide and hydrochloric acid has been used to give the monohydrate at 73% yield.
In a more efficient and controllable one-pot synthesis, cyanamide is treated with hydrazine hydrochloride to give aminoguanidine hydrochloride, which is then diazotized as in Thiele's original process. Addition of ammonia or sodium hydroxide followed by heat-induced cyclization gives the anhydrous product in 74% yield.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “5-Aminotetrazole” is chemical compound. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through 5-Aminotetrazole, chemical and compound, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “chemical compound” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q25323820. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1892 and 1901.
A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “5-Aminotetrazole”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow 5-Aminotetrazole primary sources, 5-Aminotetrazole archive and 5-Aminotetrazole research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “5-Aminotetrazole”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “5-Aminotetrazole” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.