Isotopes of americium
Artificial nuclides with atomic number of 95 but with different mass numbers
Americium (95Am) is an artificial element, and thus a standard atomic weight cannot be given. Like all artificial elements, it has no known stable isotopes. The first isotope to be synthesized was 241Am in 1944. The artificial element decays by ejecting alpha particles. Americium has an atomic number of 95 (the number of protons in the nucleus of the americium atom). Despite 243Am being an order of magnitude longer lived than 241Am, the former is harder to obtain than the latter as more of it is present in spent nuclear fuel.
Nineteen radioisotopes of americium, ranging from 229Am to 247Am have been characterized; another isotope, 223Am, has also been reported but is unconfirmed. The most stable isotopes are 243Am with a half-life of 7,350 years and 241Am with a half-life of 432.6 years. All of the remaining radioactive isotopes have half-lives that are less than seven days, the majority of which are shorter than two hours. This element also has fourteen meta states, with the most stable being 242m1Am (half-life 141 years).
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Isotopes of americium” as artificial nuclides with atomic number of 95 but with different mass numbers. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as artificial nuclides with atomic number of 95 but with different mass numbers. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q784903. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1944.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Isotopes of americium”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Isotopes of americium primary sources, Isotopes of americium archive and Isotopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Isotopes of americium”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Isotopes of americium” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.