CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Amelogenesis imperfecta

dental enamel hypoplasia characterized by abnormal enamel formation

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ461854 ↗
Source-derived summary

Amelogenesis imperfecta (AI) is a group of congenital disorders, involving the abnormal formation of tooth enamel, the external layer of the crown of teeth. Amelogenesis imperfecta can be unrelated to any systemic or generalized conditions or can be part of a syndromic condition.

Amelogenesis is the process of enamel formation. Healthy, fully formed enamel is approximately 96% mineral by weight and forms over months to years in humans, depending upon the tooth in question.

Amelogenesis imperfecta typically occurs as a result of mutations in the genes that encode proteins directly involved in tooth enamel formation, although there are some rare exceptions. Knowledge of the specific functions of some of the proteins encoded by these genes is incomplete. In short, pathogenic variants in these genes prevent amelogenesis occurring as it should, leading to amelogenesis imperfecta.

People with amelogenesis imperfecta may have teeth with thin or even absent enamel or enamel which is soft or brittle. Their remaining tooth enamel or tooth surface may be of abnormal color, for example yellow, brown or opaque white, and may be pitted. Affected teeth have a higher risk for dental cavities and are likely to be hypersensitive to temperature changes.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Amelogenesis imperfecta” as dental enamel hypoplasia characterized by abnormal enamel formation. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 195-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Amelogenesis, imperfecta and dental can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as dental enamel hypoplasia characterized by abnormal enamel formation. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q461854. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Amelogenesis imperfecta”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Amelogenesis imperfecta primary sources, Amelogenesis imperfecta archive and Amelogenesis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Amelogenesis imperfecta”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Amelogenesis imperfecta” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.