CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Lia Hinten

Dutch athlete (1942–2021)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ2614802 ↗
Source-derived summary

Amelia Antonia Josepha Hinten (26 August 1942 – 26 April 2021) was a Dutch athlete. She competed at the 1964 Summer Olympics in the pentathlon and finished in 14th place. After marrying W. Louer on 22 April 1966 she changed her name to Lia Louer and won a silver medal in the 400 m at the 1967 European Indoor Games.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Lia Hinten” as dutch athlete (1942–2021). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Hinten, Dutch and athlete.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1942, 2021, 1964, 1966—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1942-08-26. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Hinten, Dutch and athlete providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Lia Hinten”, the useful work is to connect “dutch athlete (1942–2021)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2614802. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1942, 2021, 1964 and 1966.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Lia Hinten”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Lia Hinten primary sources, Lia Hinten archive and Hinten research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Lia Hinten”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Lia Hinten” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.