CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Amazonsaurus

species of reptile (fossil)

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ577431
Source-derived summary

Amazonsaurus ( AM-ə-zən-SOR-əs, 'Amazon lizard') is a genus of diplodocoid sauropod dinosaur from the Early Cretaceous Period of what is now South America. It would have been a large-bodied quadrupedal herbivore with a long neck and whiplash tail. Although more derived diplodocoids were some of the longest animals ever to exist, Amazonsaurus was probably not more than 12 meters (40 ft) long. Gregory S. Paul estimated in 2010 its weight at 5000 kg.

Fossils of Amazonsaurus, including some back and tail vertebrae, ribs, and fragments of the pelvis, are the only dinosaur remains identifiable at the generic level from the Itapecuru Formation of Maranhão. This geologic formation dates back to the Aptian through Albian epochs of the Early Cretaceous, or about 125 to 100 million years ago. Amazonsaurus was recovered in sediments which are interpreted by geologists as floodplain deposits near a river delta.

Discovery and naming

Fossils of Amazonsaurus were first unearthed in the Mata locality in Itapecuru-Mirim County, Maranhão Province in the Brazilian Amazon. They were collected during a Brazilian expedition to the Lower Cretaceous-aged strata of the Itapecuru Formation of the Parnaíba Basin, a stretch of intracratonic rocks that covers much of northeastern Brazil. Over the course of its excavation, researchers collected a single, associated sauropod skeleton including two dorsal vertebral neural spines, two dorsal centra, a neural spine of an anterior caudal vertebra, four caudal vertebrae, eight chevrons, an ilium, an incomplete pubis, and three ribs.

Editorial summary

“Amazonsaurus” enters the record as species of reptile (fossil). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Amazonsaurus, species and reptile can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Amazonsaurus, species and reptile.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Amazonsaurus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Amazonsaurus, species and reptile provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q577431. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Amazonsaurus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Amazonsaurus primary sources, Amazonsaurus archive and Amazonsaurus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Amazonsaurus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Amazonsaurus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.