CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dashdavaagiin Amartüvshin

Mongolian judoka

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ14688984 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dashdavaagiin Amartüvshin (Mongolian: Дашдаваагийн Амартүвшин) is a male Mongolian judoka. He won the silver medal in the extra-lightweight division (‍–‍60 kg) at the 2013 World Judo Championships.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Dashdavaagiin Amartüvshin” as mongolian judoka. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1987-12-15. The account is most persuasive where Dashdavaagiin, Amartüvshin and Mongolian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as mongolian judoka. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q14688984. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2013.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dashdavaagiin Amartüvshin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dashdavaagiin Amartüvshin primary sources, Dashdavaagiin Amartüvshin archive and Dashdavaagiin research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dashdavaagiin Amartüvshin”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dashdavaagiin Amartüvshin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.