CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Amanipodagrion

species of damselfly

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ307220 ↗
Source-derived summary

Amanipodagrion gilliesi is a species of damselfly endemic to the East Usambara Mountains of north-eastern Tanzania. It is the sole species in the genus Amanipodagrion, which in turn is the only genus in the family Amanipodagrionidae, one of two families in the superfamily Mesopodagrionoidea.

Commonly known as the Amani flatwing, it is a slender dark-coloured damselfly with a conspicuous white tip to the abdomen. Males have a broad dark band near the tips of the wings. The species is associated with shaded forest streams and is known from only a tiny area within the Amani-Sigi Forest Reserve in the East Usambara Mountains.

Because of its extremely restricted distribution and the continuing degradation of surrounding forest habitat, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) has assessed the Amani flatwing as Critically Endangered.

Description

The Amani flatwing has a long, extremely slender abdomen, which is darkly coloured with a conspicuous white tip. Its wings are distinctly narrower at their base than at their tip, and the males have a broad brown band close to their wing tips.

Range

It is endemic to the Amani Sigi Forest of the East Usambara Mountains from Tanzania. The Amani flatwing population appears to be largely confined to a 500 meter long stream in the Amani-Sigi Forest Reserve, although a single male has been found outside of this reserve.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Amanipodagrion” as species of damselfly. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 223-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Amanipodagrion, species and damselfly can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of damselfly. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q307220. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Amanipodagrion”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Amanipodagrion primary sources, Amanipodagrion archive and Amanipodagrion research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Amanipodagrion”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Amanipodagrion” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.