Alternativity
weaker property than associativity

In abstract algebra, alternativity is a property of a binary operation. A magma G is said to be left alternative if
(
x
x
)
y
=
x
(
x
y
)
{\displaystyle (xx)y=x(xy)}
for all
x
,
y
∈
G
{\displaystyle x,y\in G}
and right alternative if
y
(
x
x
)
=
(
y
x
)
x
{\displaystyle y(xx)=(yx)x}
for all
x
,
y
∈
G
{\displaystyle x,y\in G}
. A magma that is both left and right alternative is said to be alternative.
Any associative magma (that is, a semigroup) is alternative. More generally, a magma in which every pair of elements generates an associative submagma must be alternative. The converse, however, is not true, in contrast to the situation in alternative algebras.
Examples
Examples of algebraic structures with an alternative multiplication include:
Any semigroup is associative and therefore alternative.
Moufang loops are alternative and flexible but generally not associative. See Moufang loop § Examples for more examples.
Octonion multiplication is alternative and flexible.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Alternativity” is weaker property than associativity. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Alternativity, weaker and property, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “weaker property than associativity” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q438727. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Alternativity”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Alternativity primary sources, Alternativity archive and Alternativity research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Alternativity”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Alternativity” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.