CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Allographa guainiae

species of lichen-forming fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ138566147 ↗
Source-derived summary

Allographa guainiae is a species of crustose lichen-forming fungus in the family Graphidaceae. It is a green-gray, bark-dwelling lichen with prominent, straight, slit-like fruiting bodies with distinctively grooved black lips. The species was described in 2023 and is known only from palm-dominated forest in Guainía, Colombia.

Taxonomy

Allographa guainiae was described as a new species in 2023 by Robert Lücking, Norida Lucia Marín-Canchala, and Bibiana Moncada, based on material collected in Colombia (Guainía Department).

Description

The body (thallus) is a crust growing on bark, up to 7 cm across and about 100–150(–200) μm thick. Its surface is coarsely uneven to irregularly warty (verrucose), green-gray, and dull; no visible border zone (prothallus) is present, though a thin, irregular black line may appear where the thallus meets neighboring lichens. In cross-section, the thallus has a distinct, firm outer skin (cortex, 15–25 μm), a relatively thick algal layer (30–70 μm), and a thick inner tissue (medulla, 50–100 μm); crystals are present in both the algal layer and medulla, including clusters of calcium oxalate. The algal partner (photobiont) is from the green algal genus Trentepohlia.

The fruiting bodies are slit-like structures (lirellae) that are straight, unbranched, and prominently raised to sitting directly on the thallus surface (sessile), with a thallus-derived rim along the sides (lateral thalline margin). They are typically 1–3 (sometimes up to 5) mm long and 0.4–0.7 mm wide, with the inner disc hidden from view.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Allographa guainiae” as species of lichen-forming fungus. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2023—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Allographa, guainiae and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of lichen-forming fungus. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q138566147. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2023.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Allographa guainiae”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Allographa guainiae primary sources, Allographa guainiae archive and Allographa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Allographa guainiae”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Allographa guainiae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.