CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Alisa van Oijen

cyclist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 3, 2025
Entity authorityQ19661916 ↗
Source-derived summary

Alisa van Oijen (born 1 October 1992) is an Austrian former professional racing cyclist. She was born in the Netherlands and moved to Austria at the age of six. From 2014 to 2015, van Oijen was riding for the women's UCI team NÖ Radunion Vitalogic. In 2017, she rides for the German amateur team Maxx-Solar Cycling Team. Her best career result so far has been a 7th place in the road race of the 2014 Austrian championships as well as several medals in U23 competitions.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Alisa van Oijen” as cyclist. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1992, 2014, 2015, 2017—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1992-10-01. The account is most persuasive where Alisa, Oijen and cyclist can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as cyclist. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q19661916. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1992, 2014, 2015 and 2017.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Alisa van Oijen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Alisa van Oijen primary sources, Alisa van Oijen archive and Alisa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Alisa van Oijen”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Alisa van Oijen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.