CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Alibijaban

island in the Philippines

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ25239255
Source-derived summary

Alibijaban, also spelled Alibihaban, is an island barangay located in the Ragay Gulf off the southeastern coast of Bondoc Peninsula on the Philippine island of Luzon. With a recorded population of 1,738 inhabitants in 2020, Alibijaban is the least populous of the seven barangays that compose the municipality of San Andres, in Quezon province and is the only one not on the mainland. It was previously part of the municipality of San Narciso until 1959.

The island is known for its pristine mangrove forest and coral reefs. It is also visited for its white sandy beaches and rich bird life. It is protected under the National Integrated Protected Areas System as a protected landscape and seascape called the Alibijaban Protected Landscape and Seascape which covers an area of 1,056 hectares (2,610 acres). Until 2025, it was classified as a wilderness area. 225 hectares (560 acres) of waters surrounding it have also been declared a marine protected area known as the Alibijaban Fish Sanctuary.

Description

Alibihaban is located in the southwestern end of Ragay Gulf approximately 3.6 kilometres (2.2 mi) from the mainland of Bondoc Peninsula. It is roughly 4.6 kilometres (2.9 mi) from north to south, and 1.3 kilometres (0.81 mi) from east to west at its widest point.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Alibijaban” is island in the Philippines. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Alibijaban, island and Philippines, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewMost useful as a place-based finding aid connecting the present description to earlier jurisdictions, maps and built evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020, 1959, 2025—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Alibijaban, island and Philippines is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “island in the Philippines” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q25239255. Authority coordinates are 13.345, 122.719. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2020, 1959 and 2025.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Alibijaban”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Alibijaban primary sources, Alibijaban archive and Alibijaban research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Alibijaban”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Alibijaban” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.