CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Ali Rasso Dido

Kenyan politician- Member of parliament for Saku Constituency, Marsabet County

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 28, 2026
Entity authorityQ15733971 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ali Rasso Dido (born 23 October 1961) is a Kenyan politician who has been United Republican Party member of the National Assembly for Saku since March 2013.

He was educated at King's College London (MA Defence Studies, 1999) the Open University (MBA, 2003) and the University of Nairobi.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Ali Rasso Dido” as kenyan politician- Member of parliament for Saku Constituency, Marsabet County. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1961, 2013, 1999, 2003—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1961-10-23. The account is most persuasive where Rasso, Dido and Kenyan can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the places & architecture register because the source frames it as kenyan politician- Member of parliament for Saku Constituency, Marsabet County. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Place names and jurisdictional language are key evidence: both can reveal earlier catalogue descriptions and overlooked record series. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 28, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15733971. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1961, 2013, 1999 and 2003.

Critical limits

Modern boundaries and familiar names can conceal earlier jurisdictions or structures that do not align with the present site. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ali Rasso Dido”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ali Rasso Dido primary sources, Ali Rasso Dido archive and Rasso research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ali Rasso Dido”?
  2. What physical evidence or contemporary plan supports the description?
  3. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ali Rasso Dido” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.