CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

SAS Outeniqua

ship built in 1992

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ18391658 ↗
Source-derived summary

SAS Outeniqua (A 302) was a sealift and replenishment ship operated by the South African Navy between 1993 and 2004. During her operational career she conducted several "flag-showing" cruises to African ports and provided support for South Africa's Antarctic research program. Outeniqua was also the venue for unsuccessful peace talks between Zaire's President Mobuto Sese Seko and rebel leader Laurent Kabila in May 1997.

Construction and acquisition

The ship was constructed at the Kherson Shipyard in Ukraine as the second Arctic supply vessel of Project 10621, and launched as Aleksandr Sledzyuk (Russian: Александр Следзюк) on 6 September 1991. Aleksandr Sledzyuk's displacement was 21,025 tons full load, with dimensions 166.3 metres (546 ft) length overall and 22.6 metres (74 ft) beam. She was powered by a single MAN B&W 8DKRN-60/195 diesel producing 13,200 kW (17,700 bhp). She was designed to be capable of breaking through 1 metre (3.3 ft) of ice while travelling at a speed of 2 knots (3.7 km/h). Aleksandr Sledzyuk entered service on 3 April 1992, and was renamed Yuvent (Russian: Ювент) the next day after being delivered to shipping company Aqua Limited of Kaliningrad.

On 26 February 1993 Yuvent was purchased by Armscor for R40 million on behalf of the South African Navy to replace the SAS Tafelberg. She was commissioned into the Navy as SAS Outeniqua on 8 June 1993.

Editorial summary

“SAS Outeniqua” enters the record as ship built in 1992. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Outeniqua, ship and built can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1993, 2004, 1997, 1991—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Outeniqua, ship and built.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“SAS Outeniqua” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Outeniqua, ship and built provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18391658. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1993, 2004, 1997 and 1991.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “SAS Outeniqua”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow SAS Outeniqua primary sources, SAS Outeniqua archive and Outeniqua research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “SAS Outeniqua”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “SAS Outeniqua” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.