CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Albrecht van Loo

Dutch politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 8, 2023
Entity authorityQ2023595
Source-derived summary

Albrecht van Loo (The Hague, around 1472 - The Hague, January 5, 1525) was a Dutch Grand pensionary.

Biography

Van Loo studied at the universities of Leuven and Orléans. Until 1505 he was city attorney of Dordrecht. At the Hof van Holland, Zeeland en West-Friesland, he was deputy secretary between 1505 and 1508, and councilor between 1510 and 1513, and then again between 1515 and 1524. From 1513 to 1524 he was State attorney (Grand pensionary) of the States of Holland. From 1515 to 1524 he was a Councilor in the Court of Holland. The simultaneous exercise of the functions of State attorney and councilor in the Court of Holland was seen as incompatible by the Dutch city governments, yet Van Loo was able to maintain this status quo for a period of nine years. Van Loo preceded Aert van der Goes as Grand pensionary of Holland.

Family

Van Loo was a son of Albrecht van Loo, pensionary of Dordrecht (1505-1511) and Dieuwertje van Egmond van Cranenburch. He married Maria Zwinters, daughter of Pieter Zwinters and Catharina Borre van Amerongen.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Albrecht van Loo” as dutch politician. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Albrecht, Dutch and politician.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1472, 1525, 1505, 1508—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1472. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Albrecht, Dutch and politician providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Albrecht van Loo”, the useful work is to connect “dutch politician” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 8, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q2023595. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1472, 1525, 1505 and 1508.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Albrecht van Loo”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Albrecht van Loo primary sources, Albrecht van Loo archive and Albrecht research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Albrecht van Loo”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Albrecht van Loo” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.