CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Alberto Colunga Cueto

Spanish historian

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ8193467 ↗
Source-derived summary

Alberto Colunga Cueto O.P. (Noreña, 27 November 1879 - Caleruega, 22 April 1962) was a Spanish Dominican priest and translator. Together with Eloíno Nácar Fúster he produced a renowned translation of the Bible known as Nácar-Colunga.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Alberto Colunga Cueto” as spanish historian. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1879, 1962—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1879-11-27. The account is most persuasive where Alberto, Colunga and Cueto can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as spanish historian. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q8193467. VIAF identifies the subject as 102330202. The Library of Congress control number is n81043251. 2 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1879 and 1962.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Alberto Colunga Cueto”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Alberto Colunga Cueto primary sources, Alberto Colunga Cueto archive and Alberto research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Alberto Colunga Cueto”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Alberto Colunga Cueto” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.