CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Albert and Celestine Mabey House

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ85740569 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Albert and Celestine Mabey House, at 10201 S. 1300 West in South Jordan, Utah, was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 2013.

It is an Italianate and Victorian house built in 1898.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Albert and Celestine Mabey House” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Albert, Celestine and Mabey, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1300, 2013, 1898—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1898. For this dossier, Albert, Celestine and Mabey is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q85740569. Authority coordinates are 40.566, -111.929. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1300, 2013 and 1898.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Albert and Celestine Mabey House”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Albert and Celestine Mabey House primary sources, Albert and Celestine Mabey House archive and Albert research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Albert and Celestine Mabey House”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Albert and Celestine Mabey House” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.