CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Albert Wood (rugby union)

English rugby union player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 31, 2025
Entity authorityQ4711495 ↗
Source-derived summary

Albert Wood was a rugby union footballer who played in the 1880s. He played at representative level for England, and at club level for Halifax, as a forward, e.g. front row, lock, or back row. Prior to Tuesday 27 August 1895, Halifax was a rugby union club.

Playing career

Albert Wood won a cap for England while at Halifax in 1884 against Ireland.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Albert Wood (rugby union)” is english rugby union player. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Albert, Wood and rugby, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1895, 1884—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Albert, Wood and rugby is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “english rugby union player” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 31, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q4711495. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1895 and 1884.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Albert Wood (rugby union)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Albert Wood (rugby union) primary sources, Albert Wood (rugby union) archive and Albert research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Albert Wood (rugby union)”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Albert Wood (rugby union)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.