Abū 'Amr al-Ḥasan ibn 'Alī ibn Ghassān al-Shākir al-Baṣrī
Open-knowledge reference entry
Abū ʿAmr al-Ḥasan ibn ʿAlī ibn Ghassān al-Shākir al-Baṣrī, also known as al-Shākir al-Baṣrī (fl. second half of the eleventh century CE) was an Arabic-language scholar from Basra, known for his expertise in ḥadīth, the Qurʾan, fiqh and adab. What survives of his work today are his riddles, of which 74 are recorded in verse and ten in prose in the Kitāb al-iʿjāz fī l-aḥājī wa-l-alghāz bi-rasm al-amīr Qaymāz (Inimitable Book on Quizzes and Riddles, Composed for the Emir Qaymāz) composed during the reign of Caliph al-Muqtafī (1136–60CE) by Abū al-Maʿālī Saʿd ibn ʿAlī al-Ḥaẓīrī. Al-Shākir al-Baṣrī composed a work called Kitāb al-Marmūs, known now only from the material which al-Ḥaẓīrī drew from it. The Kitāb al-Marmūs contained both riddles by al-Shākir and by at least ten others; it was one of al-Ḥaẓīrī's principal sources. The main source for al-Shākir's life is the Irshād al-Arīb ilā Maʾrifat al-Adīb by Yāqūt al-Hamawī.
An example of al-Shākir's riddles is the following:
The solution is 'washing line'.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Abū 'Amr al-Ḥasan ibn 'Alī ibn Ghassān al-Shākir al-Baṣrī” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 21, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q110413267. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1136.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Abū 'Amr al-Ḥasan ibn 'Alī ibn Ghassān al-Shākir al-Baṣrī”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Abū 'Amr al-Ḥasan ibn 'Alī ibn Ghassān al-Shākir al-Baṣrī primary sources, Abū 'Amr al-Ḥasan ibn 'Alī ibn Ghassān al-Shākir al-Baṣrī archive and 'Amr research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Abū 'Amr al-Ḥasan ibn 'Alī ibn Ghassān al-Shākir al-Baṣrī”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Abū 'Amr al-Ḥasan ibn 'Alī ibn Ghassān al-Shākir al-Baṣrī” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.