Aithiopes
Open-knowledge reference entry
The Aithiopes is a tragedy by the 5th century BCE Athenian playwright Sophocles that survives only in fragments.
Content
Jebb et al. believe that the Aithiopes by Sophocles ought to be identified with his play the Memnon. Lloyd-Jones says that the plot, though almost entirely unknown, is probably based on the story of the Ethiopian prince Memnon who was killed by Achilles, after having himself killed Nestor's son Antilochus in the Trojan War, which was described in the “lost post-Homeric epic Aethiopis”
Date
Unfortunately, no date more precise than the 5th century BC can as yet be reliably ascribed to the writing or production of the play.
Extant Sources
There are a number of sources for the play listed by Jebb and Lloyd-Jones; these include, among others Athenaeus, Deiphosophists 3, 122B, Photius Galeanus Lex. p. 22, and Photius 808 Theodoridis
References
Jebb, Richard C. et al. (2010) The Fragments of Sophocles, Vol. 1 Cambridge University Press ISBN 978-1-108-00986-7
Lloyd-Jones, Hugh (1996) Sophocles Fragments, Vol.
The public source identifies “Aithiopes” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Aithiopes, Open-knowledge and entry.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Aithiopes”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q60790320. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010 and 1996.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Aithiopes”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Aithiopes primary sources, Aithiopes archive and Aithiopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Aithiopes”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Aithiopes” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.