CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Agonoxeninae

subfamily of insects

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 13, 2025
Entity authorityQ47015578
Source-derived summary

The Agonoxeninae are a subfamily of moths.

History of classification

Formerly, the subfamily only contained four named species – all in the type genus Agonoxena – if (e.g. following Nielsen et al., 1996). Such a monotypic arrangement is fairly unusual in modern taxonomy without explicit need due to phylogenetic constraints.

Hodges (in Kristensen, 1999) retained the Blastodacnidae in the Agonoxenidae, giving a grouping of some 31 genera, and treating the whole as a subfamily Agonoxeninae of the grass-miner moths (Elachistidae). Collectively, the Agonoxenidae and "Blastodacnidae" are known as palm moths.

Genera

Agonoxena Meyrick, 1921

Asymphorodes (formerly in Cosmopterigidae)

Cladobrostis

Diacholotis

Gnamptonoma Meyrick, 1917

Helcanthica

Ischnopsis

Nanodacna

Nicanthes

Pammeces Zeller, 1863 (formerly in Cosmopterigidae)

Pauroptila

Porotica

Proterocosma (formerly in Cosmopterigidae)

Former genera

Blastodacna, Dystebenna, Haplochrois, Heinemannia and Spuleria are sometimes placed here, sometimes in the Elachistidae (or Blastodacnidae).

Other genera formerly placed here:

Chrysoclista

Colonophora

Glaucacna

Palaeomystella

Panclintis

Prochola

Tocasta Busck, 1912

Zaratha

References

Nielsen E.S., Edwards E.D. & Rangsi T.V. (eds.) (1996), Checklist of the Lepidoptera of Australia; Monographs on Australian Lepidoptera Volume 4; CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 1996

Kristensen, N.P. (ed.), 1999. Handbook of Zoology: Bd. 4.

Editorial summary

“Agonoxeninae” enters the record as subfamily of insects. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Agonoxeninae, subfamily and insects can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996, 1999, 1921, 1917—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Agonoxeninae, subfamily and insects.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Agonoxeninae” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Agonoxeninae, subfamily and insects provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q47015578. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1996, 1999, 1921 and 1917.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Agonoxeninae”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Agonoxeninae primary sources, Agonoxeninae archive and Agonoxeninae research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Agonoxeninae”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Agonoxeninae” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.