CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Agathis dammara

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ607535 ↗
Source-derived summary

Agathis dammara, commonly known as the Amboina pine or dammar pine, is a coniferous tree in the family Araucariaceae, native to Sulawesi, the Maluku Islands and the Philippines.

Description

Agathis dammara is a medium-large conifer that grows up to 60 m (200 ft) tall and 1.8 m (5 ft 11 in) diameter at breast height found in lowland to upland tropical rainforests as well as lowland to lower montane rainforests. It belongs to the family Araucariaceae, widespread throughout the Jurassic, Cretaceous and Paleogene periods and emerging in the Early Jurassic (around 201 Ma), but now confined to the southern hemisphere. Mature specimens are described as long clear boles with an emergent crown of first-order branches. The bark has been described to be of various gray tones and covered with resin blisters. The leaves have been described to be thick and highly variable in color in every tree. This tree is a source of dammar gum, also known as cat-eye resin, and is also used as timber.

Taxonomy

When first discovered and listed as a species it was placed in the genus Pinus (Lambert, 1803), and then later with the firs, Abies (Poir 1817), and then with its own genus, Dammara. It was first recognised as being part of Agathis in 1807, when it was listed as Agathis loranthifolia, and beyond that with species names beccarii, celebica and macrostachys, although it acquired many more names before dammara was settled on.

Agathis celebica and Agathis philippinensis were previously considered distinct species but since 2010 have been synonymous with Agathis dammara.

Editorial summary

“Agathis dammara” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Agathis, dammara and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1803, 1817, 1807, 2010—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Agathis, dammara and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Agathis dammara” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Agathis, dammara and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q607535. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1803, 1817, 1807 and 2010.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Agathis dammara”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Agathis dammara primary sources, Agathis dammara archive and Agathis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Agathis dammara”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Agathis dammara” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.