CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Pleurotus dryinus

species of fungus

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ820657 ↗
Source-derived summary

Pleurotus dryinus, commonly known as the veiled oyster mushroom, is a species of fungus in the family Pleurotaceae. It grows on dead wood and is a weak pathogen, especially infecting broad-leaved trees.

Taxonomy

The original definition of this fungus as Agaricus dryinus was made by Christian Hendrik Persoon in 1800. In 1871, Paul Kummer introduced Pleurotus as a genus and defined three similar ringed species: Pleurotus corticatus, Pleurotus albertini and P. dryinus. They were distinguished because only P. corticatus has intertwined ("anastomosing") gills on the stem and P. albertini is bigger and grows on conifer wood rather than oak. All three are now considered to be forms of the same species. The name dryinus takes precedence because it is the oldest.

Also, in 1874 Elias Magnus Fries defined a species as Pleurotus tephrotrichus, which has a deeper grey colour. This has also been incorporated into P. dryinus but may be distinguished as the variety tephrotrichus.

Etymology

The species name is a Latinised version of the Greek word "dryinos" (δρύῐνος), meaning "related to oak", referring to one of its main hosts.

Editorial summary

“Pleurotus dryinus” enters the record as species of fungus. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Pleurotus, dryinus and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1800, 1871, 1874—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Pleurotus, dryinus and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Pleurotus dryinus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Pleurotus, dryinus and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q820657. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1800, 1871 and 1874.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Pleurotus dryinus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Pleurotus dryinus primary sources, Pleurotus dryinus archive and Pleurotus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Pleurotus dryinus”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Pleurotus dryinus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.