CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Nauclea latifolia

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ39822881
Source-derived summary

Nauclea latifolia, also known by its common name African peach, is a species of flowering plant in the family Rubiaceae, native to tropical regions of sub-Saharan Africa.

It grows as a spreading deciduous or evergreen shrub or small tree, typically 4–6 m tall, though it may reach greater heights under favorable forest conditions. The species is characterized by a multi-stemmed habit, rough dark grey-brown bark, opposite glossy green leaves, and terminal spherical heads of small, fragrant white to yellowish flowers. It produces fleshy syncarp fruits up to 8 cm in diameter containing numerous small seeds embedded in sweet, edible pink pulp.

It is widely known in traditional African medicine as "African quinine" due to its antimalarial properties. Various parts of the plant, including roots, bark, leaves, and fruits, are used to treat fever, pain, diarrhea, diabetes, and infectious diseases, while the fruits are consumed as a famine food rich in carbohydrates, vitamins, and minerals.

Taxonomy

It was first described scientifically by the British botanist James Edward Smith in 1813. The species has historically been placed in the genus Sarcocephalus, and a widely cited synonym is Sarcocephalus latifolius (Sm.) E.A. Bruce.

The genus name Nauclea derives from the Ancient Greek naus (ship) and kleio (to close), referring to the structure of the fruit, while the species epithet latifolia originates from Latin latus (broad) and folium (leaf), describing the plant's broad leaves.

Modern phylogenetic studies support the inclusion of African species such as N. latifolia within a broadly circumscribed Nauclea to maintain monophyly of the genus.

Editorial summary

“Nauclea latifolia” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Nauclea, latifolia and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1813—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Nauclea, latifolia and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Nauclea latifolia” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Nauclea, latifolia and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q39822881. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1813.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Nauclea latifolia”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Nauclea latifolia primary sources, Nauclea latifolia archive and Nauclea research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Nauclea latifolia”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Nauclea latifolia” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.