CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety

journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ4689871 ↗
Source-derived summary

The African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety has been published since 1991 by the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health and is financially supported by the World Health Organization and the International Labour Organization.

Editorial summary

“African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety” enters the record as journal. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what African, Newsletter and Occupational can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1991—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1991-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around African, Newsletter and Occupational.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, African, Newsletter and Occupational provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4689871. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1991.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety primary sources, African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety archive and African research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “African Newsletter on Occupational Health and Safety” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.