CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Adruitha Lee

make-up artist

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ15885455 ↗
Source-derived summary

Adruitha Lee is a hairstylist. In 2014, she and Robin Mathews won an Academy Award for Best Makeup and Hairstyling for their work in the film Dallas Buyers Club. In 2018, she and Deborah La Mia Denaver were nominated for a BAFTA Award for Best Makeup and Hair for their work in the film I, Tonya, which also earned them a few other nominations.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Adruitha Lee” is make-up artist. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Adruitha, make-up and artist, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2014, 2018—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2000-01-01. For this dossier, Adruitha, make-up and artist is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “make-up artist” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15885455. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2014 and 2018.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Adruitha Lee”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Adruitha Lee primary sources, Adruitha Lee archive and Adruitha research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Adruitha Lee”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Adruitha Lee” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.