CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen

German chemist (1775-1815)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ96242
Source-derived summary

Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen (5 September 1775 – 16 July 1815) was a German chemist.

Life and education

Gehlen was born in Bütow, Farther Pomerania (now Bytów, Poland), he is known as the publisher of Neues allgemeines Journal der Chemie (1803–1806), Journal für Chemie und Physik (1806–10) and the Repetitorium für die Pharmacie (first series; later continued by Johann Andreas Buchner).

In 1804, he noticed that when a solution of uranium chloride in ether was exposed to sunlight, it quickly changed colour from bright yellow to green and precipitated.

He studied at the University of Königsberg and obtained his residency in 1806 from the University of Halle, where he worked as a chemist in the clinical institute of Johann Christian Reil. From 1807 to 1815, he served as an academic chemist at the Bavarian Academy of Sciences. He died from arsenic poisoning in Munich on 16 July 1815, age 39.

References

Sources

This article contains content from the Owl Edition of Nordisk familjebok, a Swedish encyclopedia published between 1904 and 1926, now in the public domain. Gehlen, Adolf Ferdinand

Albert Ladenburg (1878). "Gehlen, Adolf Ferdinand" . Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie (in German).

Editorial summary

“Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen” enters the record as german chemist (1775-1815). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Adolph, Ferdinand and Gehlen can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1775, 1815, 1803, 1806—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1775-09-15. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Adolph, Ferdinand and Gehlen.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Adolph, Ferdinand and Gehlen provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q96242. VIAF identifies the subject as 8140591. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1775, 1815, 1803 and 1806.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen primary sources, Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen archive and Adolph research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Adolph Ferdinand Gehlen” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.