CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Aditya Jagtap

Indian squash player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ50189035 ↗
Source-derived summary

Aditya Jagtap (born 7 May 1992) is an Indian squash player. He is currently competing at the 2019-20 PSA World Tour. He achieved his career's highest world rankings of 61 in December 2021.

Jagtap graduated from Cornell University in 2015 while playing on the Big Red men's squash team.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Aditya Jagtap” as indian squash player. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Aditya, Jagtap and Indian.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1992, 2019, 2021, 2015—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1992-05-07. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Aditya, Jagtap and Indian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Aditya Jagtap”, the useful work is to connect “indian squash player” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q50189035. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1992, 2019, 2021 and 2015.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Aditya Jagtap”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Aditya Jagtap primary sources, Aditya Jagtap archive and Aditya research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Aditya Jagtap”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Aditya Jagtap” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.