Adenophorus
genus of plants

Adenophorus is a genus of ferns in the family Polypodiaceae, subfamily Grammitidoideae, according to the Pteridophyte Phylogeny Group classification of 2016 (PPG I). The genus is endemic to Hawaii.
Species
As of April 2025, the Checklist of Ferns and Lycophytes of the World accepted the following eleven species and two hybrids:
Adenophorus × abbottiae W.H.Wagner
Adenophorus abietinus (D.C.Eaton) K.A.Wilson
Adenophorus × carsonii Ranker
Adenophorus epigaeus (L.E.Bishop) W.H.Wagner
Adenophorus haalilioanus (Brack.) K.A.Wilson
Adenophorus hymenophylloides (Kaulf.) Hook. & Grev.
Adenophorus montanus (Hillebr.) W.H.Wagner
Adenophorus oahuensis (Copel.) L.E.Bishop
Adenophorus periens L.E.Bishop
Adenophorus pinnatifidus Gaudich.
Adenophorus tamariscinus (Kaulf.) Hook. & Grev.
Adenophorus tenellus (Kaulf.) Ranker
Adenophorus tripinnatifidus Gaudich.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Adenophorus” as genus of plants. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as genus of plants. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 3, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2842154. The first chronological checks are 2016 and 2025.
Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Adenophorus”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Adenophorus primary sources, Adenophorus archive and Adenophorus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Adenophorus”?
- Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Adenophorus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.