CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Adelaide Punch

Australian satirical magazine (1878–1884)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 16, 2026
Entity authorityQ19877318
Source-derived summary

Adelaide Punch (1878–1884) was a short-lived humorous and satirical magazine published in Adelaide, South Australia. Like Melbourne Punch, it was modelled on Punch of London.

History

Adelaide Punch had its origin in The Rattlesnake or Adelaide Punch, a fortnightly magazine first published by Haddrick and East on Thursday 24 January 1878. It failed after a few issues, leaving the printers Scrymgour and Sons holding a debt of around £100.

Rather than writing it off, they decided to persevere with its production, and momentarily interested D. W. Melville, at one time with the Register, to act as managing editor, but he found it interfered with his lucrative auctioneering business, so they settled on J. C. F. Johnson, of the Register (later M.P. for Onkaparinga). His team included D. M. "Dan" Magill (ca.1845 – 3 April 1916), also ex-Register; William John Kennedy (1848–1894), headmaster of Mount Gambier and Hindmarsh schools, as cartoonist (also associated with Quiz magazine); and C. R. Wilton, then a promising cadet.

The magazine was a considerable success, and went weekly in September 1878. Johnson purchased a half-share from Scrymgour in December that year and assumed the role of managing editor, and in 1879 became sole proprietor, bringing his brother A. Campbell Johnson in as partner.

In mid-1880 they advertised for another cartoonist (by this time the proprietors were Johnson and Scarfe); in July Adelaide Punch grew in size, and the type and layout were changed to more closely resemble the London Punch; South Australian newspapers greeted the new format with approval.

Around October 1881 Johnson hired Godfrey Egremont (died 1923), once the Register's theatre critic, prolific author and embezzler, as editor then in April 1882 sold out to E. H. Derrington, who appointed Henry O'Donnell as editor and engaged Herbert James Woodhouse (1858–1937) as cartoonist.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Adelaide Punch” as australian satirical magazine (1878–1884). This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Adelaide, Punch and Australian.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1878, 1884, 1845, 1916—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Adelaide, Punch and Australian providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Adelaide Punch”, the useful work is to connect “australian satirical magazine (1878–1884)” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 16, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q19877318. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1878, 1884, 1845 and 1916.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Adelaide Punch”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Adelaide Punch primary sources, Adelaide Punch archive and Adelaide research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Adelaide Punch”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Adelaide Punch” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.