CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Ad Schuring

Dutch theatre set and lighting designer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ132131961 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ad Schuring (1950–2024), born Adrianus Schuring, was a Dutch theatre set and lighting designer who was known for advocating for homoerotic art.

In 2016, Schuring received a Dedication Award from the Tom of Finland Foundation.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Ad Schuring” is dutch theatre set and lighting designer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Schuring, Dutch and theatre, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1950, 2024, 2016—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1950-01-01. For this dossier, Schuring, Dutch and theatre is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “dutch theatre set and lighting designer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q132131961. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1950, 2024 and 2016.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ad Schuring”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ad Schuring primary sources, Ad Schuring archive and Schuring research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ad Schuring”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ad Schuring” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.