CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Streptomyces tauricus

species of Actinobacteria

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ26292931 ↗
Source-derived summary

Streptomyces tauricus is a bacterium species from the genus of Streptomyces. Streptomyces tauricus produces tauromycetin.

See also

List of Streptomyces species

References

Further reading

Garrity, George M., ed. (2012). Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology (2nd ed.). New York: Springer Science + Business Media. ISBN 978-0-387-68233-4.

Atta-ur-, Rahman (2015). Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, Band 44. Elsevier.

Editorial summary

“Streptomyces tauricus” enters the record as species of Actinobacteria. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Streptomyces, tauricus and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012, 2015—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Streptomyces, tauricus and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Streptomyces tauricus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Streptomyces, tauricus and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q26292931. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2012 and 2015.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Streptomyces tauricus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Streptomyces tauricus primary sources, Streptomyces tauricus archive and Streptomyces research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Streptomyces tauricus”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Streptomyces tauricus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.