CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Acidocella

genus of bacteria

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ4674111
Source-derived summary

Acidocella is a genus in the phylum Pseudomonadota (Bacteria). Its members are acidophilic.

Etymology

The name Acidocella derives from Neo-Latin acidum (from Latin acidus, sour), an acid; Latin cella, a store-room, a chamber and, in biology, a cell; giving Acidocella, an acid (-requiring) cell.

Species

The genus contains:

A. aluminiidurans Kimoto et al. 2010

A. aminolytica (Kishimoto et al. 1994) Kishimoto et al. 1996, , formerly a member of the genus Acidiphilium

A. aromatica Jones et al. 2013

A. facilis (Wichlacz et al. 1986) Kishimoto et al.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Acidocella” is genus of bacteria. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Acidocella, genus and bacteria, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2010, 1994, 1996, 2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Acidocella, genus and bacteria is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “genus of bacteria” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4674111. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2010, 1994, 1996 and 2013.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Acidocella”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Acidocella primary sources, Acidocella archive and Acidocella research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Acidocella”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Acidocella” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.