CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Psychedelic syndrome

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ141273455 ↗
Source-derived summary

Psychedelic syndrome, also known as chronic LSD syndrome or "acid head" syndrome, is a partially culture-bound psychological syndrome that was proposed to involve pronounced psychosocial and personality changes due to chronic or prolonged use of psychedelic drugs, namely LSD. It was first proposed in 1969 by a physician named David E. Smith, who was the founder and medical director of the Haight Ashbury Free Clinic (also known as the "hippie clinic") in the Haight-Ashbury district of San Francisco and who had encountered many people frequently using LSD. He was also an academic and the founder and editor of the Journal of Psychedelic Drugs (1967–present). Others besides Smith made similar or analogous informal observations of the phenomenon as well.

According to Smith, the syndrome resulted in profound alterations in psychosocial functioning and lifestyle. The symptoms of the syndrome were claimed to include belief in magic or magical concepts; intense study of "metaphysical objects"; superstition; belief in astrology; belief in mental telepathy, extrasensory perception (ESP), and telekinesis; mysticism; and isolation from general or mainstream society. Additional symptoms were said to include a profound belief in non-violence and rejection of physical aggression, with consequent frequent adoption of vegetarianism due to the rejection of killing; a deep desire to return to nature and more natural ways of being; and self-psychoanalytic, pseudoreligious, and creative aspirations. The symptoms were said to be uncharacteristic of the demographics of the individuals exhibiting them, for instance many of them being from middle-class homes, being above-average in intelligence, previously holding conventional beliefs, and having little background in mystical ideas. They were also said to not be consistent with schizophrenia, as cognitive abilities and intense interpersonal relationships remained intact, and the individuals could only be described as "eccentric". The syndrome and its symptoms have also been referred to as an "unstructured psychedelic religion".

People who were claimed to have had psychedelic syndrome often belonged to the psychedelic community or hippie subculture and frequently grouped together in communal living situations. They did not feel themselves to be mentally ill and were not considered sick by other members of their community.

Editorial summary

“Psychedelic syndrome” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Psychedelic, syndrome and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1969, 1967—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Psychedelic, syndrome and Open-knowledge.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Psychedelic syndrome” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Psychedelic, syndrome and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q141273455. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1969 and 1967.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Psychedelic syndrome”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Psychedelic syndrome primary sources, Psychedelic syndrome archive and Psychedelic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Psychedelic syndrome”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Psychedelic syndrome” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.