CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Acanthispa nigripennis

species of beetle

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ2291692 ↗
Source-derived summary

Acanthispa nigripennis is a species of beetle of the family Chrysomelidae. It is found in French Guiana.

Description

Adults are elongate and shining red, while the head, a short vitta on either side of the thorax, its extreme apical margin, together with the elytra are shining black. The head is slightly excavated on the forehead and the vertex is shining and impunctate. The thorax is nearly one-third broader at the base than long, the sides rounded, narrowed in front, above subcylindrical, deeply excavated transversely near the base. The surface is impressed here and there with deep distinct punctures, a black stripe on either side closely punctured, subrugose. The scutellum is impunctate, shining red. The elytra is much broader than the thorax, sides parallel, their outer edge armed with fine, distinct serratures, posterior angles produced directly backwards into a stout acute spine. Each elytron has three elevated costae, the outer one less raised than the others, interstices impressed with a double row of deep regular punctures, the third interstice from the suture irregularly punctured along the posterior two-thirds of its course. Beneath shining rufous, the apex of the abdomen piceous.

Editorial summary

“Acanthispa nigripennis” enters the record as species of beetle. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Acanthispa, nigripennis and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 189-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Acanthispa, nigripennis and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Acanthispa nigripennis” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Acanthispa, nigripennis and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2291692. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Acanthispa nigripennis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Acanthispa nigripennis primary sources, Acanthispa nigripennis archive and Acanthispa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Acanthispa nigripennis”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Acanthispa nigripennis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.