CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Acacia divergens

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 13, 2025
Entity authorityQ15289874 ↗
Source-derived summary

Acacia divergens is a species of flowering plant in the family Fabaceae and is endemic to the south-west of Western Australia. It is diffuse, open and spreading, spiny shrub with long, arching branches, Δ-shaped to triangular, sharply pointed phyllodes with the narrower end towards the base, spherical heads of cream-coloured to pale yellow flowers and linear, curved or twisted pods.

Description

Acacia divergens is a diffuse, open and spreading shrub that typically grows to a height of 0.4–2.5 m (1 ft 4 in – 8 ft 2 in) and has its end branches long, undivided and arching downwards. Its branchlets are finely yellow-ribbed and glabrous or with short, soft hairs. The phyllodes are Δ-shaped to triangular with the narrower end towards the base, with a prominent gland-bearing angle on the upper edge, 6–10 mm (0.24–0.39 in) long, 3–8 mm (0.12–0.31 in) wide and sharply pointed with a prominent midrib near the lower edge. There are often spiny, slender stipules 2–4 mm (0.079–0.157 in) long at the base of the phyllodes. The flowers are borne in a single spherical head in axils on a slender peduncle 3.5–10 mm (0.14–0.39 in) long, the heads with five to ten cream-coloured to pale yellow flowers. Flowering mostly occurs from August to November, and the pods are linear, curved and often twisted, up to 70 mm (2.8 in) long, 2–3 mm (0.079–0.118 in) wide and thinly leathery to crust and glabrous. The seeds are more or less oblong, 2.5–30 mm (0.098–1.181 in) long and glossy brown with an aril.

A. divergens is part of the A. biflora group with phyllodes closely resembling those of A. robiniae.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Acacia divergens” as species of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 271-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Acacia, divergens and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 13, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q15289874. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Acacia divergens”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Acacia divergens primary sources, Acacia divergens archive and Acacia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Acacia divergens”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Acacia divergens” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.