CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Acacia bracteolata

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 8, 2025
Entity authorityQ15289734 ↗
Source-derived summary

Acacia bracteolata is a species of flowering plant in the family Fabaceae and is endemic to the south of Western Australia. It is a spreading shrub with narrowly elliptic or lance-shaped phyllodes with the narrower end towards the base, spherical or slightly oblong heads of lemon yellow flowers, and curved, firmly papery pods.

Description

Acacia bracteolata is spreading shrub that typically grows to a height of 30–70 cm (12–28 in). The branchlets are covered with soft or shaggy hairs. The phyllodes are elliptic or lance-shaped with the narrower end towards the base, mostly 15–25 mm (0.59–0.98 in) long and 5–10 mm (0.20–0.39 in) wide with thin, membranous stipules 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) long at the base. The flowers are usually borne in two spherical to slightly oblong heads, in axils on peduncles 4–6 mm (0.16–0.24 in) long. Each head is 4.5–5.5 mm (0.18–0.22 in) in diameter with 19 to 25 lemon yellow flowers. Flowering has been observed between July and September, and the pods are curved, firmly papery, up to 60 mm (2.4 in) long and 5–7 mm (0.20–0.28 in) wide containing dull black seeds about 4 mm (0.16 in) long with a cream-coloured, club-shaped aril.

Taxonomy

Acacia bracteolata was first formally described in 1999 by Bruce Maslin in the journal Nuytsia from specimens collected near Scaddan in 1984. The specific epithet (bracteolata) means bracteolate, referring to the protruding bracteoles of the flower heads.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Acacia bracteolata” as species of plant. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Acacia, bracteolata and species.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1999, 1984—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Acacia, bracteolata and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Acacia bracteolata”, the useful work is to connect “species of plant” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 8, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q15289734. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1999 and 1984.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Acacia bracteolata”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Acacia bracteolata primary sources, Acacia bracteolata archive and Acacia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Acacia bracteolata”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Acacia bracteolata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.