CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Acacia aptaneura

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 24, 2026
Entity authorityQ24190040 ↗
Source-derived summary

Acacia aptaneura, commonly known as slender mulga, is a species of flowering plant in the family Fabaceae and is endemic to central and western parts of Australia. It is usually an inverted cone-shaped or rounded shrub or tree, with linear or narrowly oblong phyllodes, spikes of golden-yellow flowers, and oblong to narrowly oblong pods up to 60 mm (2.4 in) long.

Description

Acacia aptaneura is an inverted cone-shaped or rounded shrub or tree that typically grows to a height of 3–10 m (9.8–32.8 ft) sometimes to 12 m (39 ft), and sometimes with a conifer-like growth form. Its new shoots and branchlets are covered with resin. The phyllodes are narrowly linear or narrowly oblong, flat, straight to round in cross section, mostly 40–100 mm (1.6–3.9 in) long, 0.8–1.5 mm (0.031–0.059 in) wide and green to grey-green. There is a gland on the edge of the phyllode near its base.

The flowers are golden and borne in cylindrical spikes mostly 10–30 mm (0.39–1.18 in) long on a peduncle 3–10 mm (0.12–0.39 in) long. Flowering occurs between March and May and June and August but can also occur in other months except January. The pods are oblong to narrowly oblong and papery, 20–60 mm (0.79–2.36 in) long and 5–10 mm (0.20–0.39 in) wide and orange-brown. The seeds are elliptic to egg-shaped, mostly 4–5 mm (0.16–0.20 in) long and 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) wide with a small, creamy-white aril.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Acacia aptaneura” as species of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 236-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Acacia, aptaneura and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q24190040. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Acacia aptaneura”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Acacia aptaneura primary sources, Acacia aptaneura archive and Acacia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Acacia aptaneura”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Acacia aptaneura” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.