CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Madiya language

Dravidian language spoken in India

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJan 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ27602
Source-derived summary

Madiya or Maria (IPA: [mɐɽijɐ]) is a Dravidian language spoken in India. It may be regarded as a dialect of Gondi, but is suspected to be mutually unintelligible with most other Gondi varieties.

Phonology

Phonology of Abhuj Maria:

Hill Maria has 3 additional consonants: a glottal stop /ʔ/, a retroflex nasal /ɳ/, and a uvular fricative /ʁ/.

In 2019, a former professor published the first book in the Madiya language.

References

Further reading

Natarajan, G. V. (1981). A descriptive grammer of abujhmaria (PhD). University of Mysore. hdl:10603/91945.

Pandey, Keshinath (1979). A Grammar of Dandami Maria (PhD).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Madiya language” as dravidian language spoken in India. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019, 1981, 1979—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Madiya, language and Dravidian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as dravidian language spoken in India. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q27602. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2019, 1981 and 1979.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Madiya language”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Madiya language primary sources, Madiya language archive and Madiya research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Madiya language”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Madiya language” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.