CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Abscissa and ordinate

names for a system's two axes in coordinate geometry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 24, 2025
Entity authorityQ58485726
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, the abscissa (; plural abscissae or abscissas) and the ordinate are respectively the first and second coordinate of a point in a Cartesian coordinate system:

abscissa

x

{\displaystyle \equiv x}

-axis (horizontal) coordinate

ordinate

y

{\displaystyle \equiv y}

-axis (vertical) coordinate

Together they form an ordered pair which defines the location of a point in two-dimensional rectangular space.

More technically, the abscissa of a point is the signed measure of its projection on the primary axis. Its absolute value is the distance between the projection and the origin of the axis, and its sign is given by the location on the projection relative to the origin (before: negative; after: positive). Similarly, the ordinate of a point is the signed measure of its projection on the secondary axis. In three dimensions, the third direction is sometimes referred to as the applicate.

Etymology

Though the word "abscissa" (from Latin linea abscissa 'a line cut off') has been used at least since De Practica Geometrie (1220) by Fibonacci (Leonardo of Pisa), its use in its modern sense may be due to Venetian mathematician Stefano degli Angeli in his work Miscellaneum Hyperbolicum, et Parabolicum (1659). Historically, the term was used in the more general sense of a 'distance'.

In his 1892 work Vorlesungen über die Geschichte der Mathematik ("Lectures on history of mathematics"), volume 2, German historian of mathematics Moritz Cantor writes:

Gleichwohl ist durch [Stefano degli Angeli] vermuthlich ein Wort in den mathematischen Sprachschatz eingeführt worden, welches gerade in der analytischen Geometrie sich als zukunftsreich bewährt hat. […] Wir kennen keine ältere Benutzung des Wortes Abscisse in lateinischen Originalschriften. Vielleicht kommt das Wort in Uebersetzungen der Apollonischen Kegelschnitte vor, wo Buch I Satz 20 von ἀποτεμνομέναις die Rede ist, wofür es kaum ein entsprechenderes lateinisches Wort als abscissa geben möchte.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Abscissa and ordinate” is names for a system's two axes in coordinate geometry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Abscissa, ordinate and names, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1220, 1659, 1892—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Abscissa, ordinate and names is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “names for a system's two axes in coordinate geometry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 24, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q58485726. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1220, 1659 and 1892.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Abscissa and ordinate”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Abscissa and ordinate primary sources, Abscissa and ordinate archive and Abscissa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Abscissa and ordinate”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Abscissa and ordinate” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.